Best ML Development Services

SoluLab vs Cleveroad: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

SoluLab (4.1/5) edges ahead of Cleveroad (3.9/5) overall. SoluLab is the better choice for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration.. Cleveroad is the stronger option for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

SoluLab vs Cleveroad: head-to-head summary

Criterion SoluLab Cleveroad
Founded 2014 2011
HQ Woodland Hills, California, United States Tallinn, Estonia
Team size 246–250 51–200
Rating 4.1 / 5 3.9 / 5
Best for Companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration. Healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.
Pricing model Project-based, dedicated team Project-based, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack OpenAI API, LangChain, Python TensorFlow, OpenCV, Python
Industries served Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce

SoluLab vs Cleveroad: overview

SoluLab

SoluLab was founded in 2014–2015 by Chintan Thakkar and Rajat Lala and is headquartered in Woodland Hills, California, with a team of roughly 246–250 engineers, data scientists, and AI specialists. The firm positions itself as an 'AI-native, Blockchain, and Web3' development company and reports having delivered 1,500+ projects across 15+ countries for clients including The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, and the University of Cambridge (per company website; independently unverifiable at this scale). Its dual focus on AI and blockchain/Web3 makes it broader than a pure ML specialist.

Cleveroad

Cleveroad was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, with an R&D center there and additional delivery staff across five countries. The company has built more than a decade of experience in healthcare, logistics, fintech, and retail, delivering web and mobile applications alongside AI/ML solutions and dedicated development teams. Cleveroad was named to the 2025 Clutch 1000 — placing it among the top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers globally on the platform — though reported employee counts vary between roughly 50 and 200.

Services and capabilities: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

Capability SoluLab Cleveroad
Custom ML Models
Computer Vision
NLP
MLOps
Generative AI
AI Consulting

Tech stack comparison: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

Framework / platform SoluLab Cleveroad
TensorFlow N/A
PyTorch N/A N/A
AWS
Azure N/A N/A
Google Cloud N/A N/A
LangChain N/A
Hugging Face N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

Criterion SoluLab Cleveroad
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Project-based, Dedicated team Project-based, Dedicated team, Fixed project
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

Dimension SoluLab Cleveroad
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech
Best use cases Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor., Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm., Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor.
Typical project type Project-based Project-based

SoluLab vs Cleveroad: pros and cons

SoluLab
+ Named enterprise clients (The Walt Disney Company, Mercedes-Benz, University of Cambridge) offer verifiable reference points, though the specific scope of each engagement is unconfirmed.
+ 246–250 team size supports mid-to-large engagements without enterprise-firm overhead.
+ Combined AI and blockchain/Web3 capability is useful for clients building tokenized or decentralized AI products.
+ 10 years of company history (since 2014–2015) under continuous founder leadership.
- 1,500+ projects claim across 15+ countries is difficult to independently verify at face value.
- Blockchain/Web3 focus alongside AI means clients purely interested in ML may be paying for adjacent expertise they don't need.
Cleveroad
+ 2025 Clutch 1000 placement (top 30 highest-rated global B2B providers) is a strong, independently verified distinction.
+ 13+ years of operating history (since 2011) with consistent focus on healthcare, logistics, and fintech verticals.
+ AI-assisted development services line reflects the firm keeping pace with modern AI-augmented delivery practices, not just AI as a client-facing product line.
- Employee-count sources conflict meaningfully (50 vs. 51–200), so confirm current AI-specific team size before contracting.
- AI/ML is one of several service lines (alongside general web/mobile development) rather than the firm's primary identity.

Who should choose SoluLab?

SoluLab is the right choice for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration..

Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Media & Entertainment, Automotive, Education, FinTech.

Who should choose Cleveroad?

Cleveroad is the right choice for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..

Named to the 2025 Clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers on the platform.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce.

Decision matrix: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Cleveroad
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme SoluLab
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: SoluLab (Not published) vs Cleveroad (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical SoluLab
You need production MLOps support after model launch Both offer MLOps support
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

Use case SoluLab fit Cleveroad fit Winner
Company building an AI product with a blockchain or Web3 component needs a single integrated vendor. Strong Strong Both equally
Enterprise wants a vendor with named brand-name reference clients for procurement comfort. Strong Limited SoluLab
Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm. Limited Strong Cleveroad
Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor. Limited Strong Cleveroad
Fixed-scope ML build Limited Limited Both equally
Ongoing model retraining Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: SoluLab vs Cleveroad

SoluLab (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Combines AI-native development with blockchain/Web3 expertise under one delivery team.. It is best for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration..

Cleveroad (3.9/5) is the better choice when healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. If your situation matches those criteria, Cleveroad is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

SoluLab vs Cleveroad FAQ

Is SoluLab better than Cleveroad?

SoluLab (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. SoluLab is better for companies that want AI development from a vendor also fluent in blockchain/Web3 integration.. Cleveroad is better for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..

How do SoluLab and Cleveroad differ in pricing?

SoluLab uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Cleveroad uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: SoluLab or Cleveroad?

SoluLab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between SoluLab and Cleveroad?

SoluLab's primary differentiator is: combines ai-native development with blockchain/web3 expertise under one delivery team.. Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: named to the 2025 clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated b2b service providers on the platform.. They also differ in team size (246–250 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Media & Entertainment, Automotive vs Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.