Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Cleveroad (3.9/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.8/5) overall. Cleveroad is the better choice for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for enterprises wanting AI/MLOps delivery from a 35-year-old IT consultancy with an extensive multi-industry track record.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cleveroad | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 1989 |
| HQ | Tallinn, Estonia | McKinney, Texas, United States |
| Team size | 51–200 | 750+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice. | Enterprises wanting AI/MLOps delivery from a 35-year-old IT consultancy with an extensive multi-industry track record. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, dedicated team | Time & materials, managed engagement |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | TensorFlow, OpenCV, Python | AWS, Azure ML, Google Cloud |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce | Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Telecom |
Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft: overview
Cleveroad
Cleveroad was founded in 2011 and is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, with an R&D center there and additional delivery staff across five countries. The company has built more than a decade of experience in healthcare, logistics, fintech, and retail, delivering web and mobile applications alongside AI/ML solutions and dedicated development teams. Cleveroad was named to the 2025 Clutch 1000 — placing it among the top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers globally on the platform — though reported employee counts vary between roughly 50 and 200.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft was founded in 1989 and is headquartered in McKinney, Texas, bringing together more than 750 engineers and consultants with a track record of over 4,200 successful projects for 1,400+ clients across healthcare, insurance, investment, manufacturing, retail, and telecom. Its AI practice includes AI engineers, generative AI consultants, and MLOps experts working with both open-source frameworks and cloud-native AI services, and Clutch has named ScienceSoft a 2018 Global IT Leader among its Clutch 1000 companies. At 35+ years old, it is one of the longest-established firms in this list, with AI as a newer addition to a much older core business.
Services and capabilities: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Cleveroad | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Custom ML Models | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer Vision | ✓ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Cleveroad | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| TensorFlow | ✓ | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | N/A | ✓ |
| LangChain | N/A | N/A |
| Hugging Face | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Cleveroad | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Project-based, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Managed engagement, Time & materials, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Cleveroad | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech | Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm., Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor. | Enterprise wants AI/MLOps delivery from a vendor with 35+ years of institutional stability., Insurance or healthcare company needs a vendor with a very large (4,200+) project delivery track record. |
| Typical project type | Project-based | Managed engagement |
Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Cleveroad | |
|---|---|
| + | 2025 Clutch 1000 placement (top 30 highest-rated global B2B providers) is a strong, independently verified distinction. |
| + | 13+ years of operating history (since 2011) with consistent focus on healthcare, logistics, and fintech verticals. |
| + | AI-assisted development services line reflects the firm keeping pace with modern AI-augmented delivery practices, not just AI as a client-facing product line. |
| - | Employee-count sources conflict meaningfully (50 vs. 51–200), so confirm current AI-specific team size before contracting. |
| - | AI/ML is one of several service lines (alongside general web/mobile development) rather than the firm's primary identity. |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | 35+ years of operating history (since 1989) is among the longest track records of any firm in this list. |
| + | 4,200+ successful projects for 1,400+ clients provides an extensive delivery pattern library across industries. |
| + | 2018 Global IT Leader recognition from Clutch, part of the Clutch 1000, is an independently sourced distinction. |
| + | 750+ engineers and consultants with dedicated MLOps and generative AI consulting roles, not just generalist developers relabeled. |
| - | AI is a comparatively newer addition to a company whose core 35-year identity is broader IT consulting. |
| - | 750-person total headcount spans many practice areas, so AI-specific bench depth is smaller than the total suggests. |
Who should choose Cleveroad?
Cleveroad is the right choice for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..
Named to the 2025 Clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers on the platform.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain, FinTech, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
ScienceSoft is the right choice for enterprises wanting AI/MLOps delivery from a 35-year-old IT consultancy with an extensive multi-industry track record..
35+ years of continuous operating history (since 1989), among the longest-established vendors in this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Telecom.
Decision matrix: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cleveroad |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Cleveroad |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cleveroad (Not published) vs ScienceSoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | ScienceSoft |
| You need production MLOps support after model launch | ScienceSoft |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | ScienceSoft |
Use case fit: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Cleveroad fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare or logistics company wants an AI feature built by a Clutch 1000-recognized full-stack development firm. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech startup needs both application development and ML modeling from a single Estonia-based vendor. | Strong | Limited | Cleveroad |
| Enterprise wants AI/MLOps delivery from a vendor with 35+ years of institutional stability. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Insurance or healthcare company needs a vendor with a very large (4,200+) project delivery track record. | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-scope ML build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Ongoing model retraining | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft
Cleveroad (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Named to the 2025 Clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated B2B service providers on the platform.. It is best for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice..
ScienceSoft (3.8/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting AI/MLOps delivery from a 35-year-old IT consultancy with an extensive multi-industry track record.. If your situation matches those criteria, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cleveroad vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Cleveroad better than ScienceSoft?
Cleveroad (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cleveroad is better for healthcare, logistics, and fintech companies wanting an Estonia-based full-stack development firm with an AI practice.. ScienceSoft is better for enterprises wanting AI/MLOps delivery from a 35-year-old IT consultancy with an extensive multi-industry track record..
How do Cleveroad and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Cleveroad uses project-based, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. ScienceSoft uses time & materials, managed engagement pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cleveroad or ScienceSoft?
Cleveroad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cleveroad and ScienceSoft?
Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: named to the 2025 clutch 1000, placing it in the global top 30 highest-rated b2b service providers on the platform.. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: 35+ years of continuous operating history (since 1989), among the longest-established vendors in this list.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Logistics & Supply Chain vs Healthcare, Insurance).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.